從Smart Mobs那看來的消息。MIT新出版了一本叫做「線上公民生活」(Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth)的書,其內容在討論數位媒體工具所造成的效應;例如:人們如何利用這些工具學習、連結、溝通與成長。
當中有一個章節,是由Howard Rheingold所寫的,簡單介紹了年輕人可以使用哪些數位工具「介入」公共生活。全文可下載。
大略翻了一下這篇文章,對當中一段對於部落客的描述格外感興趣。它是這麼寫的:
又,阿孝老師也在今天寫了篇「網路公民行動的政治潛能」,可以當作很粗略的台灣經驗參照(Rheingold自己也說他這篇文章需要更多的經驗研究與之對話)。而一個人,或一個組織,真的有心利用部落格作為一個介入公共事務的工具的話,孫窮理的那篇「工會如何運用網路傳播–從技術、觀念到組織工作」則是列為必讀啊。
當中有一個章節,是由Howard Rheingold所寫的,簡單介紹了年輕人可以使用哪些數位工具「介入」公共生活。全文可下載。
大略翻了一下這篇文章,對當中一段對於部落客的描述格外感興趣。它是這麼寫的:
Many bloggers serve as “intelligent filters” for their publics by selecting, contextualizing, and presenting links of particular interest for that public. In this context, a “public” differs from an “audience” because you, in your role as a blogger, have in mind when you write a community of peers who not only read but actively respond to what you write, who might act upon your advice, and who might join you in discussion and collective action.回想過去這一年發生的事情,是啊,部落客的公共參與,的確是這樣發生的啊。
.....
What interests you, the blogger? What issue or idea strongly, even passionately, draws your attention and provokes your opinion? Is there a community that shares your interest? Could you and the others constitute a public? Clearly defining and understanding your public is the necessary first step to developing a public voice—the voice you use when you keep that public, and your potential to act together, clearly in mind as you blog.
又,阿孝老師也在今天寫了篇「網路公民行動的政治潛能」,可以當作很粗略的台灣經驗參照(Rheingold自己也說他這篇文章需要更多的經驗研究與之對話)。而一個人,或一個組織,真的有心利用部落格作為一個介入公共事務的工具的話,孫窮理的那篇「工會如何運用網路傳播–從技術、觀念到組織工作」則是列為必讀啊。
Comments